Producing Sites, Exploring Identities: Youth Online Authorship
With her definitions of Sites: blogs, websites, and Social Networking Sites (SNS), Stern clearly describes the technological aspects of on-line communication. In my reaction to Susannah Stern’s article, I am most interested in two key terms: identity and authorship and how they interweave.
This article reminded me of Zines. Back when I was in high school (20 years ago), I had several friends who self-published or helped in creating Zines. These were underground magazine/ pamphlet type publications that included poetry, artwork, fictional short stories, non-fiction essays, political propaganda, and often directions to the next underground party. Often the authors were anonymous. These Zines were dark, roughly printed, often mocking societal constraints and full of cuss words. The alternative to these Zines was the Literary Club who published similar components (save the propaganda and party directions) in a more formal, “respectable” format in which no anonymity was present. All authors were proudly presented. The difference between these two forms of authorship related to the identity of the kids at hand. Clearly, the Literary Club was for kids who were “academic," traditional and most often White (in a Eurocentric sense). My friends who came from either alternative/Hippie backgrounds or were Hispanic punks produced the Zines.
I am also reminded of a film that spoke largely of similar ideas and came out the year I graduated – Pump Up the Volume. It was largely about Teen anonymity and identity, pirate radio, suicide and disconnect with the elder generation, particularly in education. I remember loving the movie.
The difference between anonymous work and “named” work used to rely more heavily on someone else’s judgment – a teacher, a parent, a principal, executives, etc. One important component that I see with the authorship that is occurring on-line is the presence of true, authentic identity with any work. This is not clearly positive or negative, as Stern explores, and as Kevin adamantly states in his Blog posting regarding frightening self-expression. Even as we play around with false identity or unconventional identities, we are exploring self-expression. Writing is a dialogic process, creative, reflective or both. That being stated, I believe it is also important to recognize that a factor of Site Production is also the need to belong. This is their generation
It is crucial to allow Youth (all of us, really) to explore the multiple nuances of identities. Particularly as we recognize the complexities of Discourse and the integration of cultural shift, we must recognize that identity is never a solid concept. It is ever changing. For instance, as Jill aptly described on a discussion board, we have now added the Discourse of doctoral student onto our individual identities. In addition, we are a cohort, supporting each other’s intellectual and spiritual well-being. As Youth explore these nuances and are provided a more useful forum to do this (on-line) perhaps the recognition of adults is particularly crucial in respect to safety. The wisdom of media literacy and critical thinking skills become much more than a simple lesson to be taught and notched away.
In reflecting on identity and authorship, I wonder if the same trend follows on-line as it did 20 years ago; are the anonymous publishers largely of a particular race or socioeconomic status? If not, how is access to particular sites measured? What about other boundaries Youth begin to explore, such as Ana sites? How do traditionally marginalized students explore the benefits of on-line publication? Are they able to explore the intricacies of their identities? When a family is struggling to survive (for a number of given reasons -- immigration, poverty, language, illness, ghetto, environment, cultural disconnect,) how do these ideals that Stern is talking about -- technological challenge, catharsis, self-documentation, conceptualizing the audience, self-presentation -- fit in? Are students from these families even participating in Online Authorship? If so, how could it or does it transcend into social justice?
Hi Gwen,
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for sharing your experiences regarding youth authorship of 'yesteryears'(Zines & Pump up the volume). it was an eye-opener....it's funny how life is cyclical...the same things...just a different generation trying to resolve their conflicts with the best tools availabe! It is precisely because of the uniqueness of the adolescent stage, when there is this pronunced focus on 'identity, that I believe all adolescent generations will seek their forms of self expression. As I mentioned in a discussion for our EDLT class, quoting from Trilling & Fadel (2009),"Though these skills have been around for a very long time, they take on new signifance with the digital power tools now available....(p.86). What I am fascinated with is how youths will they change the "discourse" of online authorship itself!
You ask some great questions re: that of statistics regarding participation in online authorship by race,socioeconomic status, marginalized groups, technological challenges etc. and implications for social justice. I believe that if it is possible to get answers to such questions, this could provide some major opportunities to make the case for increase use and even funding for such educational pursuits. But as Stern(2008)says in her article, there is "...no composite list of youth Internet authors or the works they
publish online"; and the fact that adolescents are drawn to online authorship precisely because of 'annonymity', I suspect it may prove difficult to get such statistics on a national level. Perhaps in smaller school or classroom settings, educators may be able to collect data via school records, or post-participation during classroom use, and then use this information to inform future use. I would certainly agree that there is potential for online authorship to transcend to greater social justice (all of the issues above play a role), but only if we can ensure the most basic form of social justice at the onset: that there is accesiblity for all!
Gwen,
ReplyDeleteGreat connections to "our" youth. You caused me to think more about the quest and evolution of identity. As I thought about your posting through the lens of education, I wonder how the personal sites could be brought into schools to possibly encourage increased motivation for students. I can't also help but think that just like Zines, if these aspects of technology and society became used for instructional purposes if youth would be sure to not participate. Perhaps as we explore avenues to connect youth and learning this inclusion of personal site communication in teachers' lessons may be a real example of communicating for different purposes and audiences (just as you describe with the school lit magazine vs. zines).
I looked up the facebook stats by age group and from March 2009, it indicates that about 6 million people from 13-17 have facebook accounts. Increasing tech access to more youth in this age group and utilizing this tool for education and social justice would be a revolutionary step for us.
Gwen and anyone else out there,
ReplyDeleteIs it possible to ruin youth self expression by making it a part of mainstream education? Doesn’t it start to lose its coolness factor when we institutionalize it?
One of the ongoing debates over the internet is regarding "control" and censorship as we recently witnessed between Google and the Chinese government. See:
“China censor to Google: obey controls.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/14/china-censor-to-google-ob_n_422920.html
“China defends censorship after Google threat,” http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60C1TR20100114
People complained LOUDLY against any restrictions to the internet. However, a recent study claims the Chinese are just fine with censorship. See: “Few in China Complain About Internet Controls,” March 2008 at http://pewresearch.org/pubs/776/china-internet
Definitely a different strokes for different folks kind of thing. Which leads one to conclude that being told to use technology for educational purposes is different than enjoying the freedom to doing something independently. Its like what one my student’s told me “If a teacher asked me to create a blog I would think there was some ‘catch’ to it and it would limit my freedom.... otherwise what’s the purpose.”
Gwen,
ReplyDeleteI was reminded of Zines as well. I used to hoard them as a teenager! I remember hiding them from my mom because of the language...but then running across a stash of her counter-culture publications from the 60's and being amazed at the parallels.
I wonder about demographics as well...do those teens who see themselves going to college and into the "professional" world moderate their online selves more than those who don't?
Kevin,
I think that your question about the "cool factor" is a good one. Part of the allure of any adolescent authorship is that it belongs to the adolescent alone...that it isn't mediated by adults or the adult "gaze". (The idea of the "male gaze" is one that goes back to the same rabble-rousing 60's feminism that I read about for the first time in my mom's zines).
I have a young cousin who has "friended" me on Facebook. He has then been very irritated with me if I have spoken to him in "real life" about anything that he has posted. I perceive his postings as public knowledge...he perceives them as privileged knowledge. If I acknowledge it in another space, I am crossing a privacy boundary for him.
Wow Jesse,
ReplyDeleteThat is so interesting about your cousin. I wonder if it is a total exploration of a different "self?"
Dennis, thanks for looking up the stats on Facebook. Fascinating. One thing I appreciate about Facebook as an adult is that it allows different "faces" of me to arise... student, sense of humor, athlete, parent, friend, social activist, etc. Yet, I also recognize the superficiality of these small blogs/ social sites, even in my own.
Thalia, I love your idea of casually "tracking" your student's usage of the internet in an individual classroom -- at the very least looking for the same information from our students as Stern did. I wonder if they would be open enough to participate?